Skip to content
Rarity Rides — Rare machines. Remarkable stories.
LotusCompetition / Archive

1967 Lotus Type 51 Formula Ford

History and verified programme identity

Updated October 20, 2026 • Rarity Rides editorial team
Collector fileLOT-051Documented by Rarity Rides
At a glance

1967 Lotus Type 51 Formula Ford

Explore the 1967 Lotus Type 51 Formula Ford: programme history, design, verified rarity scope, specifications and credited photography.

The supplied photograph shows a red 1968 Type 51B Formula Ford at an outdoor gathering, with number 3 on the nose.
Photo: dave_7 / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0. Source-provided thumbnail supplied without local cropping, retouching or synthetic enlargement. Supplied under CC BY-SA 2.0. Retain the named creator, original source and licence link. Follow the licence for edits and reuse; no endorsement is implied

The Lotus Type 51 develops the earlier Type 31 into a defined Formula Ford customer programme. Its small production reference and later B-variant photograph are kept at their proper scopes.

History and verified programme identity

Classic Team Lotus dates the Type 51 to 1967, describes a spaceframe based on the Type 31 with 1.5- and 1.6-litre Ford engines, and reports 165 built. The supplied photograph identifies a 1968 Type 51B. That later variant can illustrate the family if its caption retains the narrower label. The 165-car statement remains a custodial programme reference rather than a surviving-car count or an independently audited completed tally.

Engineering and design

Formula Ford gives the small single-seater a different engine and customer-use context from the Grand Prix cars. The Type 51’s structural relationship with the Type 31 is useful, but it does not make their build records one list. In the photo, the narrow nose, exposed wheels and rear powertrain create a familiar open-wheel package. Current safety equipment, body finish and mechanical preparation may belong to later ownership. The original design account explains the programme, while a chassis-specific history would establish which parts and category details belong to the illustrated B-variant.

The physical car in the supplied photograph

The supplied photograph shows a red 1968 Type 51B Formula Ford at an outdoor gathering, with number 3 on the nose. dave_7’s source identifies the variant and example year. The caption does not describe it as an unchanged first 1967 Type 51.

A closer look at the programme

The red exhibit provides a clear front-quarter view of the narrow cockpit and exposed running gear. Its later variant label is valuable precisely because related Formula Fords can look similar at a mixed event. A photograph can document the body shown while leaving the original chassis and component histories to records. The primary Type page then supplies the family’s design basis and build reference. Together they allow a readable model profile without converting every development suffix into a separate manufacturing run or assuming that modern presentation details were present on every customer car. The Type 51B photograph shows the narrow front body beside exposed wheels and a small driver opening. Its red finish and modern gathering context are recorded as appearance, while the explicit B-variant title locates the subject within the Type family. This is more useful than silently calling it a first-season car. A reader can compare it with the earlier Type 31 and later Type 61 through visible proportions, then use the primary source to understand the separate original programmes. The common competition category supplies context, not a combined chassis list.

Collecting and chassis evidence

A customer Formula Ford record should connect the chassis and original delivery with later training, race preparation and restoration. A later B specification is not counted as another original car merely because its body or components changed. The public 165 reference belongs to the original Type family as described by the custodian. The current photograph adds a dated individual appearance, with mechanical originality kept separate.

Related Lotus designs and meaningful comparisons

The Type 31 provides the earlier spaceframe basis, while the Type 61 is a later Formula Ford comparison. Reading the three together explains both continuity and new programme identities. The same competition category does not justify combining their outputs or applying one photographed engine to every model.

Reading the sources

The programme sources and the photograph answer different questions. Manufacturer and custodial records establish the original model, Type, category and published production scope. The creator’s file establishes the pictured subject, setting and image permission. An individual chassis history can then add ownership, competition entries and dated repairs without changing the scope of the original programme. Build references are not survivor counts, and a later specification does not automatically become an additional newly manufactured vehicle. Where primary evidence does not establish a complete fabrication census, that field remains unassigned.

Specifications and rarity evidence

Programme reference year 1967
Model / Type Type 51 Formula Ford — Type 51
Body / competition role Customer Formula Ford spaceframe programme
Programme year 1967
Category Formula Ford
Structure Spaceframe based on Type 31
Engine programme 1.5 and 1.6-litre Ford applications
Photographed variant 1968 Type 51B
Published build / register reference 165
Independently audited completed tally Not assigned
Count scope Published source reference: 165. Scope follows the named programme or register; independently audited completed output and survivor census remain unassigned.
Original inventory status LOT-051 — Verified

Frequently asked questions

Does a 51B photograph change the profile’s introduction year to 1968?

No. The Type 51 programme is dated 1967 by the custodian. The supplied example is explicitly captioned as a 1968 51B variant.

How is Type 51 Formula Ford classified?

This is a Team Lotus competition Type archive. It remains separate from Lotus road-car production. Customer cars, works entries and converted chassis need a reconciled scope before any complete fabrication tally is assigned.

Which technical details are established for the programme?

The primary record supports programme year: 1967; category: Formula Ford; structure: Spaceframe based on Type 31. These are programme or explicitly attributed photo references. A particular surviving car’s engine, chassis repairs and competition preparation require its own dated documentation.

Does the photographed appearance establish factory originality?

The caption records a real creator-identified Type 51 Formula Ford subject and its later setting. It establishes the illustration’s scope, while original components, restoration work and individual race provenance require chassis-specific evidence. A competition number, current paint or museum display is not used as an originality certificate.

What rarity or archive scope is verified?

Published source reference: 165. Scope follows the named programme or register; independently audited completed output and survivor census remain unassigned.

Who photographed the supplied image?

dave_7 via Wikimedia Commons, under CC BY-SA 2.0. The original file and licence are linked with the image. Retain the creator, source and licence when uploading, exporting or reusing it; local retouching and synthetic enlargement have not been performed.

Related Lotus profiles

Sources and photo credits

Photograph: dave_7 via Wikimedia Commons original source, CC BY-SA 2.0. Source-provided thumbnail supplied without local cropping, retouching or synthetic enlargement.

The collector file

Built in limited numbers

Published source reference: 165. Scope follows the named programme or register; independently audited completed output and survivor census remain unassigned.

The data file

Specifications

Factory specifications may vary by model year, market and configuration.

Identity & production

Official model
Type 51 Formula Ford
Evidence & accountability

Sources and verification

  1. classicteamlotus.co.uk
Reviewed byRarity Rides editorial team