Skip to content
Rarity Rides — Rare machines. Remarkable stories.
LamborghiniConcept / Archive

1968 Lamborghini Miura Roadster

Origins and the correct historical identity

Updated October 20, 2026 • Rarity Rides editorial team
Collector fileLAM-011Documented by Rarity Rides
At a glance

1968 Lamborghini Miura Roadster

Lamborghini Miura Roadster: 1968 Bertone open-concept history, distinct physical identity and credited Amelia Island photography.

Lamborghini Miura Roadster at Amelia Island in 2013, photographed by Michael Gulett; physical open Bertone concept dating to 1968.
Photo: Michael Gulett / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0. Source-provided photograph supplied without local cropping, retouching or text removal. A source thumbnail is used where available. Image supplied under CC BY-SA 3.0. Retain the named photographer, original source and licence link; follow the licence for later edits and reuse. No endorsement implied

The 1968 Lamborghini Miura Roadster is an open-body interpretation with its own physical identity. Its blue body and roofless cabin make a striking companion to the Miura coupes, while the archive preserves its special-bodied programme separately.

Origins and the correct historical identity

Lamborghini’s 2022 museum announcement identifies the unique Bertone Roadster as a 1968 programme; the Miura register dates its presentation to Brussels. This is the physical open concept, not a numbered retail Miura Roadster series. The source’s unique-object description is retained without extrapolating a wider fabrication count.

Design: what makes Miura Roadster distinctive

Michael Gulett’s photograph shows a light-blue car with an open cabin, low windscreen and broad rear section. The absence of a fixed roof changes the balance of the Miura-shaped volumes. Attention moves from the nose toward the occupants and the openings behind them. The result can be read directly in the photograph, without imagining a roof-folding mechanism that the image does not establish.

Engineering and the concept brief

Opening a coupe form involves body and cabin decisions as well as the removal of an enclosure. The collector’s technical questions concern how the programme dealt with structure, airflow around the occupants and the space behind the seats. Correctly scoped construction records would answer those questions. A standard coupe workshop specification is a comparison point, but cannot certify the Roadster’s exact individual body or component history.

Why this Lamborghini belongs in the design archive

The Roadster belongs beside the three Miura coupe series because it offers a visibly different answer to the same family theme. It also belongs beside other physical Bertone concepts as a record of coachbuilding experimentation. Those two comparisons can coexist. The named body is the organising identity, so ordinary roof conversions and replicas should not be attached to this programme without provenance.

Recognising and documenting the physical subject

Lamborghini Miura Roadster at Amelia Island in 2013, photographed by Michael Gulett; physical open Bertone concept dating to 1968. The original file record identifies the named subject, and the visible configuration supports the match. The photograph is a record of this appearance rather than a certification of every concealed component. Preserve its creator and individual licence when uploading the image. Further views of the cabin, rear, identification plates and mechanical areas would extend the dossier, provided they are connected to the same model or documented object. A chassis number should enter the individual record only when a clear source establishes it.

Reading a show-car specification

A concept specification describes a programme at a particular moment. Some details identify a physical component, some describe the intended vehicle architecture, and others set a target for a possible future model. Those distinctions matter especially for dramatic show cars, whose presentation may combine working mechanisms with design demonstrations. The specification table retains the manufacturer’s named proposal and leaves unsupported outputs or manufacturing totals unfilled. A later production car’s engine, transmission or acceleration time is not a substitute for evidence about this concept.

The body itself is a valuable technical document. Wheel placement suggests packaging priorities; cabin height and glazing show how visibility and occupant space were presented; openings and surface transitions reveal the designers’ approach to access and airflow. Those observations are interpretations of the visible design, rather than proof of a completed road test. Pairing them with the original programme description gives a collector a useful way to understand the car without assigning capabilities that the surviving records do not establish.

Collector significance and future research

The value of a concept archive lies in preserving the relationship between an idea, the people who developed it and the object that made it visible. A strong collection record keeps the original name, reference year, credited photographs and source links attached to that relationship. If new photographs or factory documents emerge, they can add a show appearance, a construction detail or a later change without replacing the original identity. This is particularly useful for a car whose published pictures may span several exhibitions and whose name may have acquired different spellings.

The complete fabrication tally remains unknown here. Exhibition appearances do not provide a count: the same object can travel, and a programme may also produce models or development articles that are not visible publicly. The concept belongs in this archive because its physical identity is supported, rather than because a single surviving photograph implies that only one was made. A future tally should identify which objects it covers and the document establishing that scope. Until then, this profile provides the historical and photographic foundation for further documentation.

Reading the evidence for this profile

The original source links below identify the programme and the historical statements used in this article. The photograph has its own creator and licence record, separate from the manufacturer’s vehicle history. Keep both when transferring this profile into a collection catalogue. A manufacturing tally describes how many cars belong to a defined original programme; it does not measure how many survive, how many are publicly visible, or how many retain all their original components. Those individual questions require dated chassis and restoration evidence. The reference year likewise describes the programme’s introduction or named historic configuration, while the supplied caption states the photographed setting and any established individual identity. This lets future research expand the car’s history without blurring the scope of the record already assembled here.

Specifications and verified rarity

Reference year 1968
Model / programme Miura Roadster
Body / role Bertone open-body concept
Engine / architecture Miura-based V12 open-concept programme; individual installed ratings unassigned
Reference-year basis Programme introduction / named historic configuration
Individual chassis certification Not assigned from the photograph
Exact manufacturing tally Not established
Rarity evidence Physical concept archive scope; tally unknown
Rarity scope Verified physical Lamborghini design programme; complete fabrication tally unconfirmed. Included as Concept / Archive with no invented one-car total.
Inventory reference LAM-011 — Verified

Frequently asked questions

Was there a regular retail Roadster series?

This record covers the documented physical Bertone concept.

Which year identifies the programme?

1968.

Does the photo show a folding roof?

It records the open body without establishing a roof mechanism.

Are later roof conversions automatically this Roadster?

They require their own individual provenance.

What rarity or archive scope is verified?

Verified physical Lamborghini design programme; complete fabrication tally unconfirmed. Included as Concept / Archive with no invented one-car total.

Who took the supplied photograph?

Michael Gulett via Wikimedia Commons, under CC BY-SA 3.0. The original file and licence links accompany the image. Retain that credit when the photograph is uploaded, exported or reused.

Related Lamborghini profiles

Sources and photo credits

Photograph: Michael Gulett via Wikimedia Commons original file, CC BY-SA 3.0. Source-provided photograph supplied without local cropping, retouching or text removal. A source thumbnail is used where available. Lamborghini Miura Roadster at Amelia Island in 2013, photographed by Michael Gulett; physical open Bertone concept dating to 1968.

The collector file

Built in limited numbers

Verified physical Lamborghini design programme; complete fabrication tally unconfirmed. Included as Concept / Archive with no invented one-car total.

The data file

Specifications

Factory specifications may vary by model year, market and configuration.

Identity & production

Official model
Miura Roadster
Evidence & accountability

Sources and verification

  1. www.thenewsmarket.com
  2. registroitalianomiura.it
Reviewed byRarity Rides editorial team